Timing Cube

50 dma is more accurate

I subscibed to them for 2 years (once back in 2006'ish and another time in 2008'ish. I have been following them this entire time through their website, and it seemed that their results have been getting worse and worse. Every time that they would get hammered, they would redo their model. (Yea.. easy for them - what about the losses?)

Now, not surprisingly, they have changed their model considerably ("Turbo" added) to allow for more trading. To hell with brokerage commissions! If these guys were really credible people, they would suspend their service temporarily and find a better way of market timing instead of costing their subscribers a lot of money in fees, commissions, and losses. Thank good I'm not with them anymore.

Ac35155

Frequency
Accuracy
Value

Better resulting use 50 DMA average

I subscribed for several years and finally canceled in beginning of 2011. Their results and signals were ok at best. They changed their model and revised their historical performance a few years back because the original model did not work so well.

I keep the service so long as a way to alert me to take action with my 401K account. I was also too lazy to find anything better. But I finally had enough and will take my chance with the 50 Day Moving Average or 200 Day Moving Average.

Bobbyvl

Frequency
Accuracy
Value

Didn't perform well for me

Didn't perform well for me when I had it and if memory servies I think the results may be backtested results not prospectively observed results.

Angelajk

Frequency
Accuracy
Value